Catch critical issues in research before publication

Reviewer3 logoruns objective, verifiable checks on submitted manuscripts. Reference verification, integrity, and methods, with a full panel back in minutes.

Start Your ReviewYour data stays private

Trusted by thousands of researchers

Harvard UniversityStanford UniversityMITUC BerkeleyOxford UniversityCambridge UniversityCaltechPrinceton UniversityYale UniversityETH ZurichEPFLColumbia UniversityUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of PennsylvaniaJohns Hopkins UniversityDuke UniversityHarvard UniversityStanford UniversityMITUC BerkeleyOxford UniversityCambridge UniversityCaltechPrinceton UniversityYale UniversityETH ZurichEPFLColumbia UniversityUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of PennsylvaniaJohns Hopkins UniversityDuke University

Technical checks to support human judgment

Choose which checks run on each manuscript. Findings in one report, ordered by severity.

Which Reviewer3 checks are available to authors and reviewers, and to editors and publishers.
CheckAuthorsEditors

Submission Screening

Catches coursework, partial drafts, leftover AI prompts, and rewrites of already-published work.

Not includedIncluded

Reference Check

Finds hallucinated, retracted, irrelevant, and self-cited references.

IncludedIncluded

Fatal Flaws

Surfaces unsupported conclusions, impossible numbers, and circular reasoning.

IncludedIncluded

Claim Review

Checks the evidence behind each claim, plus the methods, statistics, derivations, and internal consistency.

IncludedIncluded

Code Replication

Runs the code and compares its output with the paper.

IncludedIncluded
Start Your ReviewReviewer? Draft a report
Contact us

We set up a pilot on a batch of your manuscripts.

Evidence from 145,000+ review comments

What we found across computer science, social science, and life science research.

90%

of Reviewer3 findings could undermine a major claim

98.5%

accuracy separating real citations from AI-fabricated ones

1st

among AI reviewers in agreement with humans

See the benchmarks

What researchers and editors are saying

"The final decision on whether to accept a paper depends on factors only an experienced human can judge. But all the upstream work—technical checks and data verification—is perfectly suited to AI. That's where Reviewer3 shines."

Prof. Adriano Aguzzi

University of Zurich

"Reviewer3 exceeded our expectations as a tool for improving manuscripts. We're hoping this will improve and expedite review outcomes when we submit our papers to academic journals."

Prof. Matt Tegtmeyer

Purdue University

"Tools like Reviewer3 can help ensure reviews are unbiased, thorough, and detail-oriented, raising the overall quality and consistency of peer review."

Dr. Antonio Cembellin Prieto

Arc Institute

Built for how you work

Whether you're preparing a submission or managing editorial workflows, Reviewer3 adapts to your needs.

For authors

Identify methodological gaps and strengthen your manuscript before submission. Unlimited revisions with Premium.

Start review

For reviewers

Bring a second set of eyes to a manuscript you have been asked to review, and write your report with more confidence.

Draft report

For editors

Speed up first-pass triage at scale. Fatal flaws, citation problems, and AI-generated text surface before manuscripts reach external reviewers.

Journal access

For institutions

Enterprise solutions for research offices, graduate programs, and grant administration.

Contact us

Ready to strengthen your research?

Join thousands of researchers using Reviewer3 to identify issues before publication.

Get startedView pricing

Running a journal? Talk to us