Reviewer3Reviewer3

Review Arena

The Review Arena presents 20 blinded pairs of peer review comments across computer science, life science, and social science venues. Each pair contains one comment written by a human reviewer and one written by Reviewer3 on the same manuscript, with the labels hidden. Can you guess which is which?

eLife: Protein aggregates are associated with replicative aging without compromising protein quality control

Review A

In Figure 5, the authors compare the degradation rate of the cytosolic UPS substrate AID-GFP in cells with an age-associated deposit to neighboring cells without a deposit. Because the formation of the deposit is highly age-dependent (as shown in Figure 1), the cells without a deposit are likely significantly younger than the cells with a deposit. Consequently, replicative age is perfectly confounded with the presence of the deposit, making it impossible to determine whether the enhanced degradation is due to the deposit itself or simply a feature of intermediate replicative age. To support the claim that the deposit promotes cytosolic quality control, the authors should compare cells of the exact same replicative age with and without the deposit, or evaluate AID-GFP degradation in hsp42Δ mutants (which lack the deposit) compared to age-matched wild-type cells.

Review B

Too many uses of "remarkably".

See the Evidence in Your Own Work

Upload a paper or grant and get a full review in minutes.

Get a Review

Product

  • For authors
  • For journals and publishers
  • Pricing
  • MCP
  • API access

Evidence

  • Overview
  • Benchmarks
  • Reference checker benchmark
  • Case studies
  • Review Arena
  • Newsroom

Compare

  • All comparisons
  • Reviewer3 vs Manusights
  • Reviewer3 vs Paperpal
  • Reviewer3 vs Thesify

Company

  • Security
  • AI policies
  • Privacy
  • Terms
© 2026 Reviewer3, Inc.
Contact