NEW AI+HUMAN PEER REVIEW
reviewer 3
Struggling with getting people to agree to review papers?
Exasperated by the time it takes them to return a report?
Underwhelmed by what is returned?
PRIVATE LLM
first draft is created by ai
Our in house LLM running on our own servers is the basis for the first draft of the peer review report. We use granular prompting tailored to the article type and the journal subject matter to come up with something that looks like a good peer review report - but it takes more than this...
Manuscript in CONTEXT
adding context from the past
The LLM does a good job of evaluating the manuscript as an entity in itself, but no man is an island and no manuscript exists outside of its preceding works. We find all related work (not all of it cited in the manuscript) and use the output from the LLM, and the related works to construct the final report
FINAL PEER REVIEW REPORT
human + ai = report
One of our 3,500 subject matter experts (PhD level or above) then use the output from the LLM and the A&I service to construct a full peer review report. This normally takes a few days, and results in a report with clear advice on whether to accept the paper, minor revisions needed, major revisions needed, or it should be rejected. Initially we work with you to determine where these editorial levels sit so we can match current human-dependent workflows.
Frequently Raised OBJECTIONS
we can't do this, can we?
We hear all sorts of objections to using a service like this - but remember, it's ultimately a human writing the report and making the final recommendation, That said, let's address the points:- Run it alongside traditional peer review services to build trust in the system.
- Remember, human peer review is slow and frequently flawed.
- Use us as a fallback when insufficient invitations to review are accepted.
- Or as a 'deciding' vote when contrasting reports are held in equal weight.
- More than one request of reviewer3 will result in different peer review reports of the same manuscript.
- We tailor the report to your specific journal/article requirements.
legal bit
t&cs
Peer review reports provided by reviewer3.com are for guidance only. They should not be relied upon as the sole adjudicator in determining whether a work is publishable or not. As our name suggests, we should be used alongside traditional review processes where possible (at least for now).
welcome tell us about yourself
let's see it in action
We'll run the first five papers through reviewer3.com for free. This allows you to see the output, experience our customer service and help determine where you want the editorial decision thresholds to sit. No cost, no commitment, just see how we perform compared to your current workflows.Note this service is only available to publishers and not authors. For that reason we need your 'work' email address to verify your employer.
© All rights reserved.
Thank You
we'll be in touch real soon